Raw public feedback, normalized.
47 live signals from the latest scrape, merged with the curated baseline. Every row keeps its public source attached — triage, not internal reproduction.
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Squid game for my home game - Hi , i regularly host some friends and have some alcohol so i am thinking of introducing it in version of squid game at home. we play 0.5$/0.5$ with usual buy in of 50$ (100BB). people usually buy in up to 3 times. i am trying to balance penalty payout and fair drinking frequency (along 2 shots per hour). i am hoping the penalty is sustainable. happy to hear your thoughts please. SQUID GAME POKER – 7 PLAYERS, 7 SQUIDS - Win any pot = take 1 Squid from the center - You must show your hand to win a Squid (no mucking the winner) - All players are free to give away, buy, or sell Squids as they wish (any time, any price) - Game ends when all 7 Squids are claimed END OF GAME: SCENARIO A – AT LEAST ONE PLAYER HAS 0 SQUIDS: - Losers (0 Squids) = pay 2BB ($1) for each Squid on the table ($7 total) + take 1 shot - All loser payments go into a pool - The pool is split among winners based on how many Squids each winner holds SCENARIO B – ALL 7 PLAYERS HAVE AT LEAST 1 SQUID: - No bounty is paid (no money changes hands) - All 7 players take 1 shot each MAXIMUM WINNINGS FOR A SINGLE WINNER: There is $7 per loser going into a pool. That pool is split among winners based on how many Squids they hold. - 1 winner, 6 losers: Pool = $42 → winner gets $42 ( max reward ) - 2 winners, 5 losers: Pool = $35 → winner with most Squids gets up to $30 - 3 winners, 4 losers: Pool = $28 → winner with most Squids gets up to $20 - 4 winners, 3 losers: Pool = $21 → winner with most Squids gets up to $12 - 5 winners, 2 losers: Pool = $14 → winner with most Squids gets up to $6 - 6 winners, 1 loser: Pool = $7 → winner with most Squids gets up to $2 - 7 winners, 0 losers: Pool = $0 → all drink a shot, no bounty won PROBABILITY OF LOSERS (random distribution): - 0 losers: 0.6% - 1 loser: 4.6% - 2 losers: 16.3% - 3 losers: 28.8% - 4 losers: 28.8% - 5 losers: 16.3% - 6 losers: 4.6% - 7 losers: 0% (impossible) PROBABILITY OF SAME LOSER REPEATING (random distribution): - Same pl
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal suggests setup or permission friction in a core capture workflow.
tested cluely on hackerrank in stealth mode and the proctoring caught it almost instantly - threw cluely on a hackerrank assessment last week to see what would happen and i was not ready for how fast it folded. ran the trial cluely on a practice hackerrank in stealth mode (their paid undetectability tier on top of the base subscription). first practice problem went fine. second one i alt-tabbed to peek at a doc i had open and the proctoring report at the end flagged "focus loss x1, application activity detected." not even a real assessment. just the practice one with proctoring toggled on. what got me curious was WHY it tripped. so i went and read what hackerrank actually scans for. it is mostly browser-side stuff, focus loss, tab switching, copy paste from outside the page, full screen exits, browser fingerprinting. on the proctor.io tier (which only some companies turn on) you also get webcam + audio + a screen recording the recruiter can scrub through later. cluely runs as a chromium overlay. it injects a window that the OS treats as a separate app. when you click into it, hackerrank registers focus loss on the assessment tab. that is the entire reason it gets flagged. it is not even some clever detection, the proctoring just sees you leave the page. after that test i switched to interviewman for the second practice run. its a native macos overlay, not a browser thing, and the window is excluded from screen capture and from the cmd+tab list. proctoring report came back empty. ran it again with every toggle on, also empty. the difference was clicking into the helper window did not register as leaving the assessment because the overlay is mouse pass-through, you read it without focusing it. so the short version. anything that lives inside or next to the browser is gonna trip the focus and fingerprint checks on hackerrank. a real desktop overlay sidesteps all of that because it is not in the browsers world. if you are only going to test ONE thing before a
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Cluely pro+ made affordable - https://www.reddit.com/r/notcluely/s/we8NEeaq1g https://notcluely.in All you need to trust us and clear interviews. DM if interested   submitted by   /u/Rutvikk   to   r/AIInterviewTools [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Weapon/Armor Balancing is (mostly) in Place, Mission Design is not. - I´ve read many Posts about Armor/Weapon Balancing and many People complaining about s1 and s2 maybe even s3 is kinda useless right now. But i think the Problem is on a other side: Even S2 Deadbolts are able to penetrate an Constellation or Vanguard. So we are able to fight off bigger ships. Small Fighters are not supposed to fight Heavy Fighters or bigger Ships. So that Part of Balancing is very good atm (for my understanding). Maybe the small Fighters dont feel in Place, especially for PvE Players like me, because there are no big payout missions with/for small Fighters. If you want to make Money with Bounty Hunting, you need to do the Heavy Missions with Constellation, Hammerhead etc. So maybe we should get more Missions with a lot of small Fighters. Like "here is a big Group of Partisans with cheap Ships". These can pay more like the other Bounty Missions because we are fighting like 12 small Fighters instead of 3. With that small Fighters would be good for their Role, even for PvE Players. And sorry for my bad English 😃 edit: Maybe saying Balance is in Place is to much. But i meant the whole Idea of small Fighters sould not be able to penetrate Big Ships, therefor you need Heavy Fighers or Torps and the whole Cycle.   submitted by   /u/Steuerknueppel   to   r/starcitizen [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Weapon/Armor Balancing is (mostly) in Place, Mission Design is not. - I´ve read many Posts about Armor/Weapon Balancing and many People complaining about s1 and s2 maybe even s3 is kinda useless right now. But i think the Problem is on a other side: Even S2 Deadbolts are able to penetrate an Constellation or Vanguard. So we are able to fight off bigger ships. Small Fighters are not supposed to fight Heavy Fighters or bigger Ships. So that Part of Balancing is very good atm (for my understanding). Maybe the small Fighters dont feel in Place, especially for PvE Players like me, because there are no big payout missions with/for small Fighters. If you want to make Money with Bounty Hunting, you need to do the Heavy Missions with Constellation, Hammerhead etc. So maybe we should get more Missions with a lot of small Fighters. Like "here is a big Group of Partisans with cheap Ships". These can pay more like the other Bounty Missions because we are fighting like 12 small Fighters instead of 3. With that small Fighters would be good for their Role, even for PvE Players. And sorry for my bad English 😃   submitted by   /u/Steuerknueppel   to   r/starcitizen [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal touches claim language or trust positioning that needs careful review.
Cluely charges $130/mo extra for screen-share invisibility. Built an alternative for $29. - Cluely is the dominant AI interview overlay right now. Their pricing page has something worth flagging. Cluely's actual pricing structure (their own pricing page): - Free: limited features - Pro: $19.99/mo, explicitly NOT undetectable - Pro + Undetectability: $149.99/mo, only tier with screen-share invisibility If you want to actually use this in real interviews where the interviewer might record the screen share, you're paying $1,800/year. GhostPilot: - $29 session pass (3 credits of 2 hours each). Includes screen-share invisibility standard. - $59/mo Pro. Unlimited sessions, same invisibility, no upcharge. - GPT-4o for answer generation, Whisper for transcription - 800ms first-token latency - Audio stays in memory only, never persisted Plus the Cluely team has had public security disclosures and ARR fraud admissions. So you're paying $130/mo extra for a feature from a team with known credibility issues. https://reddit.com/link/1tsg77j/video/elr1o5bk7d4h1/player Site: ghostpilotai.com Windows + chrome ext. Free 10 min tier (weekly refresh).   submitted by   /u/GhostPilotdev   to   r/ArtificialInteligence [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Bounty Hunters - Hello again all! I’m making a bounty hunter squad, mostly thrown together from the Anniversary quests lst’s. I know 3 I want but want advice on the other 2 I’m using Bossk for the easy payout, The Mandolorian for the insta kill and Grief Karga for mando. I have Dengar, Boba Fett, Fennec Shand, Boushh and IG-88. Currently I have Boba Fett and Boushh thrown in there and I think I want to keep Boushh because I plan to relic her soon as I’m (very slowly) working towards getting GL Leia. (13/15 of the characters for GL Leia are characters I want to level/relic anyway for other purposes so it works out well for me. And my guild does the speeder raid and I know she super useful for that) So, can I keep using Boushh? And also who would you put in slot 5?   submitted by   /u/Hot-Tumbleweed7527   to   r/SWGalaxyOfHeroes [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Bounties need to be more realistic. Less bounties, more payout, targets difficult to locate, and available to all players at the same time so they compete to win it. - As of right now... Bounties are not realistic. There are always a lot of them available, and when you take the contract other players can't take it... This defeats the purpose completely. Bounties are more of a rare and contested thing. When you take on a bounty, you are supposed to compete with many other bounty hunters to, firstly, find it... And then retrieve it or kill it, without becoming an outlaw in the process. It requires skill and dedication. And this is not the feel you should get from bounty hunting.   submitted by   /u/GimlySonOfGloin   to   r/starcitizen [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal suggests setup or permission friction in a core capture workflow.
Services we provide at notcluely - Resume making service - I have made resumes for US faang/indian IT employees with results being the frequency of interviews landed being very high than people who didn't take the service Prompt making service - Let me make a prompt for you that sounds short, logical, exceptional without sounding like AI. Results, i got a job in 20 days without any detection ever noticed by anyone (with prompts you have to use your own brain on what to speak, you cant just repeat what ai shows on screen, at best we can make what ai shows just enough to jumpstart your brain's engine to answer yourself without confusing you or the interviewer) Job profile enhancement - Let me change your profiles on LinkedIn /naukri.com, i personally get interview calls once in a while even after getting a job months ago, and I have to ghost HRs and cut calls coz i dont want to switch so fast... At peak job hunt i used to get 3-4 calls from diff HRs a day. Cluely mock interviews and practice - Learn how to achieve speed and efficiency in using cluely without messing up mid interview through our mock round where i teach you what to do and what to not do in order to not get caught. Suggestions: i suggest a resume upgrade and naukri/linkedin profile enhancement at minimum to start landing interviews at a rate you've never experienced before. As an admin with 5 yrs of experience almost, i have a track record of getting a job in 30 days of starting the hunt. If you wasted more than that, trust me, I know what to do. DM me and i can help e2e from starting the hunt to getting the job and retaining it. Services start at $6/500 and go as high as 16$/1500 depending on task The price to quality ratio is something you wont regret checkout https://notcluely.in for more   submitted by   /u/Rutvikk   to   r/notcluely [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Questions I've always had on Brook since his introduction(this will include no spoilers or topics from recent chapters) - This will not have spoilers, but with the chapter that came out over a week ago bringing one of my favorite strawhats to the front of attention I've got some questions I've always wanted to know, sorry if this has been posted before as I dont really talk to anyone but my best friend about one piece and I dont really read/follow content creators for one piece either. So to begin I've always thought it was a bit odd that Brook was introduced with the moniker of "dead bones Brooks". Cuz from what we learn from him is that him and the rumbar pirates along with laboon had adventures and they openly knew about Brooks revive fruit, why was the moniker dead bones brook on his wanted poster? And that got me looking even deeper into the wanted poster and you can see that Brooks skull skeleton is visible on his wanted poster. But how would Brook have that? If he died in the Florian triangle, his body decomposed and it took his soul years to find its way back to him, how does he have HIS wanted poster with a skull on it? Did the Morgan's news bird drop it off on the ship? Prolly not. Did he swipe it from Moria when Moria was taking his shadow? More likely but idk if the timeline of Morias age lines up with having a good bounty poster for Brook. And most importantly why "dead bones", who granted someone that title while he was flesh and blood? This just has me thinking, was there a god valley style of game in Brooks past? Did he steal the fruit from treasure chest like Iva and Big Mom? Did Imu know what would happen with his fruit and make a bounty poster for him, and like "fake a skull" picture to place on the bounty poster? Maybe some of you will have answers to this. Like I said if someone already said all this then credit to them. I only have my friend to talk one piece with and I kinda laid it out there for h
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal suggests payout math or timing is not obvious enough.
made my best month with UGC and Clipping on bounty : $3,100! - Signed up to Bounty like 3 months ago after seeing it mentioned here a couple time, had trouble getting good money in the beginning but I just got a banger month and im so happy. It works like almost every UGC marketplace, so you pick a brand they have, make the video, post it on your own account, submit the link, get paid. And what is cool is it doesn't have a follower minimum, no need to sign a contract, and no pitching to anyone. 3100 dollar month: Cluely study hack angle, 4 videos, came out to around $1,840 once two of them crossed the view threshold and the CPM kicked in a second Cluely brand, 3 videos, around $710, one of them just flopped and made almost nothing reposted two of the winners as different cuts, another $550 ish The payout structure is a flat fee per video which is small but good to have. And then they have a CPM on top which can generate the real income if your video performs, you get paid per thousand views once a clip clears the threshold. What I will say that helped is they have scripts to guide you (like the post I saw 3 months ago mentioned) and that really helped me turn my content from just boring to getting real views and engagement. Look I know its not good to put links in here but this genuinely helped me so here is the app link bounty.app and because of my good month they gave me a referral code to get people approved fast and I want to give it to this sub since it was the one that helped make that money (NNCO4KCR). Feel free to ask me any questions, so I can help!   submitted by   /u/Limp-Advantage9999   to   r/ContentRich [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
CLUELY AI - Niko na exam iko proctored ya certifications za azure na sijesoma 😂😂 hii cluely inaweza saidia??   submitted by   /u/Designer-Ad4053   to   r/SharpBoys [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal touches claim language or trust positioning that needs careful review.
The $130 Cluely loophole no one talks about - Just saw Cluely charges $19.99 for Pro, but $149.99 if you want it undetectable on Zoom/Teams. That's $130 extra per month just to hide it. I'm keeping the $19.99 plan for the AI notes, then using Cloakly (Free Tier) to make ANY window invisible locally. Works for Cluely, ChatGPT, Notion, whatever. Same result, $1,560/year saved. Screenshot of their pricing attached   submitted by   /u/Annual-Chart9466   to   r/InterviewHackers [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
The $130 Cluely loophole no one talks about -   submitted by   /u/Annual-Chart9466   to   r/InterviewHacking [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
The $130 Cluely loophole no one talks about -   submitted by   /u/Annual-Chart9466   to   r/InterviewsHell [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Recreate-from-script workflows need strong guidance to avoid low-quality ads.
The public site says creators recreate short videos from provided scripts and post them socially.
Open classification and ticket draft
View-based payment language can create payout timing and threshold questions.
The public site says creators get paid as views come in.
Open classification and ticket draft
Aggregate rating is strong, but it coexists with recent one-star billing and login complaints.
The live Cluely App Store listing reports 463 ratings and an average rating near 4.67.
Open classification and ticket draft
Bounty's aggregate rating is strong but recent RSS still contains verification and account-status blockers.
The Bounty App Store listing shows 180+ ratings and an average near 4.74 (snapshot — the live connector owns the current exact count).
Open classification and ticket draft
The live listing still uses undetectability claims, which should be watched beside cheating/privacy discourse.
Cluely's current App Store description says desktop sync is 100% undetectable and uses zero bots.
Open classification and ticket draft
Performance claims are concrete enough to turn into QA and support expectations.
Cluely's current App Store description claims 95% transcription accuracy and 300ms response time.
Open classification and ticket draft
The live Bounty listing ties payouts to virality, which should be paired with precise payout examples.
Bounty's current App Store description says creators recreate short videos for Cluely brands and get paid as videos go viral.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Thinking of buying Cluely Pro ($20/mo) just for real-time suggestions during work meetings—is it worth it? - Hey everyone, I've been looking into AI tools that give real-time suggestions during live meetings (not for interviews or anything sketchy, just regular team calls on Zoom/Meet/Teams). My use case is purely professional. I want help staying on top of discussions, getting quick context during calls, and not blanking on key points mid-meeting. Would love to hear from anyone who's actually used Cluely for regular work calls (not interviews). Is the real-time help actually useful in practice, or is there any other AI that does this for free?   submitted by   /u/DeepuuuRM [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Thinking of buying Cluely Pro ($20/mo) just for real-time suggestions during work meetings—is it worth it? - Hey everyone, I've been looking into AI tools that give real-time suggestions during live meetings (not for interviews or anything sketchy, just regular team calls on Zoom/Meet/Teams). My use case is purely professional. I want help staying on top of discussions, getting quick context during calls, and not blanking on key points mid-meeting. Would love to hear from anyone who's actually used Cluely for regular work calls (not interviews). Is the real-time help actually useful in practice, or is there any other AI that does this for free?   submitted by   /u/DeepuuuRM   to   r/Cluely [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Undetectable positioning is a direct trust and compliance surface.
The public site positions Cluely as staying completely undetectable on screen.
Open classification and ticket draft
Cluely shipped a fresh 1.2.6 bug-fix release while May reviews still show mobile login and working-state complaints.
Apple lookup shows Cluely version 1.2.6 released on May 27, 2026 with bug fixes and behind-the-scenes improvements.
Open classification and ticket draft
Recent creator chatter includes strong payout proof points.
A Reddit post says the creator cleared 480 dollars in a week clipping on Bounty.
Open classification and ticket draft
Referral or approval-bump codes may create fairness and queue confusion.
A Reddit post says an approval code takes creators out of the new-creator queue.
Open classification and ticket draft
Some creator chatter reinforces payout reliability.
A Reddit post says Bounty has paid every cycle for the past three months.
Open classification and ticket draft
Bounty onboarding has a current phone verification blocker.
A May 26 Bounty review says phone verification is stuck and no SMS code arrived across two phone numbers.
Open classification and ticket draft
Bounty shipped a current bug-fix release the same day as a phone-verification complaint.
Apple lookup shows Bounty version 2.1.7 released on May 26, 2026 with bug fixes and behind-the-scenes improvements.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Has anyone with cluely actually had it work without inventing fake jobs on your resume? Or is it just a scam and the only way it stays grounded is if you babysit every suggestion? - EVERY ai interview helper swears it pulls from your real profile. but cluely just spit out a paragraph about a project at a company i have NEVER worked at - on a live call - after i pasted my resume into the profile box twice. half hour of setup and it still made up a job for me. am i overreacting or is this a thing that happens to other people? caught it before i opened my mouth, thank god, but my hands were shaking the rest of that round. i don't know if this is a one-off bad model day or if their grounding is just busted. not sure what tipped it off either - my resume isn't long, the role description was short, nothing weird in the profile.   submitted by   /u/Opening-Project-4212   to   r/InterviewHacking [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Advertiser review timeliness is explicitly part of the operating burden.
Bounty terms say advertisers are responsible for timely review, approval, or rejection.
Open classification and ticket draft
Submission cancellation rules can create creator frustration if not explained.
Bounty terms say pending submissions can be canceled if a bounty is deactivated.
Open classification and ticket draft
Performance-to-date payout language needs clear examples for creators.
Bounty terms describe payouts based on performance to date.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal suggests setup or permission friction in a core capture workflow.
is Cluely actually a scam, or am i overreacting? bought the Pro plan and the actual stealth is on a separate higher tier - Hey! kinda new to the AI interview helper thing. been seeing ads for Cluely everywhere on twitter and youtube and almost every other clip has one, or multiple ads pushing the Pro plan where they say you can sign up and get "real-time AI help" during your interview, with the founder dropout story as the hook. Is this a scam? It seems off to me as somebody who just spent money on it. how are people getting full real-time interview help on the Pro plan when the actual screen-share invisibility part is gated behind a separate higher tier? they also say you can add undetectability or something on top, like an upgrade? Does this sort of thing cost people more money, but the upsell is just hidden in the funnel after you sign up and youre already onboarding the product? i bought Pro a couple weeks back, ran a mock on zoom with a friend, suggestions were slow, friend saw a flicker on screen share, then the popup hit me mid-setup about the invisibility tier. i refunded inside the seven days, no fight there. and theres also a breach thing from last year that has me jumpy about putting a resume into it. am i overreacting on this? help please. Thanks!   submitted by   /u/thumb9vegans   to   r/AIInterviewTools [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Uber New Grad Android Depth in Specialization Interview (US) - Hi everyone, I have an upcoming Uber New Grad Android “Depth in Specialization” interview in the US, and I wanted to know whether this round is more like a LeetCode-style coding interview or more of a deep technical discussion. For people who’ve taken it recently: Was there live coding involved? If yes, was it standard DSA/LeetCode medium style or Android-focused coding? Or was it mostly a deep dive into your projects, Android fundamentals, architecture, performance, coroutines, MVVM, etc.? How difficult were the follow-up questions? Would really appreciate hearing about your experience and what I should focus on while preparing. Thanks!   submitted by   /u/Gullible_Strategy_12   to   r/Cluely [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
User reports recurring word-level transcription errors.
Public review says the product frequently gets words wrong.
Open classification and ticket draft
Speaker attribution quality is causing trust issues in group calls.
Public review reports speech is frequently attributed to the wrong person.
Open classification and ticket draft
A user reports microphone capture not working outside scheduled meetings.
Public review says the program does not use the microphone outside meetings.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Anyone dealt with Cluely's security / bug bounty team? Response times? - It's been 10+ days since I submitted something to Cluely's bug bounty a couple of weeks ago and haven't heard back yet. Their form says 5 days for a response. Just curious has anyone here interacted with their security team or bug bounty program? Roughly how long did it take to get a reply, and what channel actually got through? Thanks. if any cluely developer here, pls check by bug bounty form and follow up email from: amgaikwad4588@gmail.com   submitted by   /u/Charming_Host_7384   to   r/Cluely [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Anyone dealt with Cluely's security / bug bounty team? Response times? - It's been 10+ days since I submitted something to Cluely's bug bounty a couple of weeks ago and haven't heard back yet. Their form says 5 days for a response. Just curious has anyone here interacted with their security team or bug bounty program? Roughly how long did it take to get a reply, and what channel actually got through? Thanks. if any cluely developer here, pls check by bug bounty form and follow up email from: amgaikwad4588@gmail.com   submitted by   /u/Charming_Host_7384 [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Anyone dealt with Cluely's security / bug bounty team? Response times? - It's been 10+ days since I submitted something to Cluely's bug bounty a couple of weeks ago and haven't heard back yet. Their form says 5 days for a response. Just curious has anyone here interacted with their security team or bug bounty program? Roughly how long did it take to get a reply, and what channel actually got through? Thanks.   submitted by   /u/Charming_Host_7384 [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
A user reports the desktop app closing during a high-stakes call.
Public review says the app closed itself during an interview.
Open classification and ticket draft
Screen-context answers are reported as wrong in analytical tasks.
Public review says screenshot-based analytical tasks produced multiple wrong answers.
Open classification and ticket draft
A public user claims the undetectable positioning failed in a high-risk context.
Public review says Cluely was detectable as a separate window during a test.
Open classification and ticket draft
Creator approval expectations vary from two days to two weeks in public chatter.
A creator comparison says Bounty approval can take one to two weeks and needs sample videos.
Open classification and ticket draft
A user reports billing surprise and inability to cancel before payment.
Public review says money was taken immediately with no chance to review or cancel.
Open classification and ticket draft
Cancellation support non-response is creating legal and trust language.
Public review says no human agent responded to a formal cancellation notice.
Open classification and ticket draft
Refund complaints have escalated into legal-rights language.
Public review cites a statutory 14-day refund right in a cancellation complaint.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public positioning is drifting toward sales-call coaching as well as notes.
A third-party review frames Cluely as a real-time overlay for sales calls.
Open classification and ticket draft
Creator approval delays are visible in public UGC communities.
A Reddit post says the creator submitted an application that never got approved.
Open classification and ticket draft
Bounty rating quality includes meme/noise reviews that can mask real onboarding blockers.
A May 21 Bounty five-star review contains off-topic meme language instead of usable product feedback.
Open classification and ticket draft
A user frames product behavior as permission/control failure.
Public review says app behavior occurred without the user's permission or control.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal touches claim language or trust positioning that needs careful review.
Undetectable plan For SWE first time - Hey, reposting because my first post got lost wanted to use cutely and get the undetectable :) I want to maximize my chances so I could ace this, I have used Cluely once already but that was for a non tech round just to back me up. Maybe 5 percent of the interview so I didn’t lose my flow. For this situation I want it to really help me when I do need it. I’ve got my first SWE internship technical interview coming up and I’ve genuinely never done one before. Kinda nervous lol. For people who’ve done internship technicals: - what was the format like? - what caught you off guard? - what do you wish you knew beforehand? Would really appreciate any advice 🙏   submitted by   /u/SevereNecessary8381 [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Got Cluely Pro + Undetectability Plan Today — Looking for 3 People to Share - Hey guys, I purchased the Cluely Pro + Undetectability plan today, and I’m looking for 3 people to share it with. 💰 Cost: $20 per person 📅 Valid till: 19th June ✅ Plan started today ⚡ Only 3 slots available If you were already planning to buy it, this could save you some money. DM me ASAP if interested — first come, first served.   submitted by   /u/LazyError8967 [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
3 1/2 months no response - Hopefully I can get assistance I’m trying this so hopefully someone who can help sees it. I’ve been a cluely legacy pro user. You get legacy for being a customer a long time before their product services changed. So you get original features. My issue is I e been waiting for customer service with multiple inquiries for over 3 months. And of course my legacy pro is having issues again and need help. The same issue happened while ago and cluely took care of it. I’m hoping someone can see this and help me fix this issue.   submitted by   /u/MrRayTradesAlot [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal suggests setup or permission friction in a core capture workflow.
Technical Round SWE Internship First time - Hey everyone, I just got invited to my first technical interview for a SWE internship and I’ve never done one before 😅 Pretty nervous tbh. For anyone who’s used Cluely, how can it help me prepare or be useful during the interview? Also any general tips on how technical interviews usually go (screen share, coding approach, communication, etc.) would be super appreciated :)   submitted by   /u/SevereNecessary8381 [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Bounty has a current navigation stability complaint in the App Store feed.
A May 18 Bounty review says the app jumps around, goes back, and cannot be used.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal suggests setup or permission friction in a core capture workflow.
Can i use cluely for tech interview help - As title says, I have a few interview coming up, can I use cluely for tech interviews? Can it read my screen and help with coding? Can it also listen to audio and answer questions asked by interviewer? Thank you   submitted by   /u/TrainingCounter5469 [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
I got pushed out at 61. Then I found out who actually took my role. - I gave a company nearly 18 years of my life. I tried to be the employee they could rely on. I moved my family three times for promotions and new positions, took on projects nobody else wanted, mentored younger engineers, and stayed late more times than I can count. A few months after I turned 61, they let me go. No real explanation, no mention of anything I had done for the company over those 18 years, nothing. They told me it wasn't related to my performance, which somehow made it worse. I felt insulted. Insulted that I had actually believed there was loyalty or appreciation for what I'd given them. For the last 6 months I've had almost no luck finding another job. I've applied for roles paying far less than what I was making and gotten no interest. I've started focusing mostly on remote positions, because in remote interviews people seem to judge your experience and communication first, rather than fixating on your age the moment you walk into the room. I also removed my birthdate from my CV. I'd rather be evaluated on skills and background than on a number hiring managers have apparently decided is disqualifying. Last week I had coffee with someone who still works at my old company. He mentioned, half as a joke, that the role I used to own is now being handled by a 24-year-old kid who started there as an intern last summer. Apparently the kid is shipping work in volumes that surprised everyone, getting praise from leadership, going into meetings with senior people and holding his own. I asked him how a junior is doing the work I spent 18 years building expertise in, and he laughed and said he saw the kid use an AI overlay called Cluely during meetings and client calls. He used it during his interview to get hired, and he's been using it on the job ever since to close the experience gap. Also management hasn't noticed since he's been sneaky about it. I didn
Open classification and ticket draft
Desktop sync is a visible promise that creates cross-device support load.
The listing positions desktop sync as working with Cluely for Mac and Windows.
Open classification and ticket draft
Zero-bot meeting positioning is powerful but can create trust and policy questions.
The listing says Cluely works with Zoom, Google Meet, and Teams with zero bots.
Open classification and ticket draft
A specific accuracy claim raises the bar for transcription complaints.
The listing claims 95 percent live transcription accuracy in noisy environments.
Open classification and ticket draft
Privacy controls are already in public copy and should be reinforced in support.
The listing says notes are stored securely, encrypted, and deletable by the user.
Open classification and ticket draft
Live answer assistance creates a trust boundary around interviews, tests, and calls.
The listing says the assistant gives suggested answers and talking points mid-conversation.
Open classification and ticket draft
Two meeting modes likely need different setup and permissions messaging.
The listing says the product works for virtual meetings and in-person conversations.
Open classification and ticket draft
Billing confirmation and refund response are appearing as a high-trust leak in current App Store reviews.
A May 13 review reports an annual Cluely subscription charge while the user says they were only checking pricing.
Open classification and ticket draft
Current App Store trust noise includes claims that reviews are not organic.
A May 13 review claims the positive review surface is being distorted by aggressive social media activity.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal suggests transcription or answer quality needs workflow-level review.
cluely vs superlay - every other post in this sub lately has someone in the comments dropping superlay as a "better alternative." it's not. I've used both for full interview loops and the gap is not close. writing this because the spam is getting out of hand and people are gonna pay 25 bucks for an inferior product based on comments from accounts that post in 4 subs and nowhere else. quick context, superlay gets pushed hard as a cluely competitor in this sub and on x. the actual product is positioned as meeting intelligence for sales, recruiting, support, and HR. it's a sales-call overlay that they reframe as an interview tool because the interview market is hot and the sales overlay market is saturated. that framing is the whole problem. what superlay actually is a meeting transcription tool with a persona builder bolted on. real-time transcript on one side, an "insights" panel on the other, an action items column at the bottom. the prebuilt personas are recruiting assistant, sales advisor, support assistant, HR advisor, meeting assistant. notice what's missing. there is no interview persona. you're meant to build one with the custom prompt builder, which is a 30 minute job per company, and the underlying prompts are still tuned for sales-shaped conversations. their pitch is real-time transcription under 300ms. that's the headline. the product is a notetaker with extra steps. what cluely actually is an overlay built specifically for live high-stakes calls where you cannot pause, cannot type, and cannot look away. one prompt window, one context layer, no dashboard. you load it with your stories, the company's eng blog or recent deals, the frameworks you want visible, and it surfaces what fits the moment. it's also lighter on the screen, which matters when you're glancing for half a second between sentences. it does meeting notes too but that's not the reason you buy it. by use case coding rounds: superlay i
Open classification and ticket draft
Mobile login appears to misroute some users toward desktop download instead of account entry.
A May 7 review says Google login does not complete and routes the user into a Mac app download state.
Open classification and ticket draft
Current iPhone reviews include blunt app-not-working reports after recent mobile releases.
A May 3 review from an iPhone user says the app is not working.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Cluely App Store review: Mobile App on iOS not - Why is the Cluely iPhone app not working???
Open classification and ticket draft
Multiple adjacent May reviews repeat an iPhone app-not-working complaint.
A May 2 review asks why the Cluely iPhone app is not working.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Cluely App Store review: Needs improvement and stuck with the yearly subscription - App stopped working , when I click login with Apple, it just shows download Mac or windows app button not letting me login. Accuracy of text captured and summary is average .
Open classification and ticket draft
Apple login and desktop-download routing look like the same onboarding break as Google login.
An April 29 review says Apple login shows only Mac or Windows download buttons and does not let the user enter.
Open classification and ticket draft
Creator account status and support appeal paths are a trust-critical Bounty workflow.
An April 29 Bounty review says an account was banned after earning and asks for a support path.
Open classification and ticket draft
Creator-company chat adds a new support and review-quality surface.
Version 2.1.0 says creators can now chat with companies.
Open classification and ticket draft
Creators are publicly checking whether Bounty is legitimate.
A Reddit post asks whether Bounty.app is legit.
Open classification and ticket draft
Approval depends on a creator application video, which needs clear evaluation criteria.
Reddit discussion says creators record a short clip and wait for review to get full access.
Open classification and ticket draft
Some creators report quick approval, setting expectations for others.
A Reddit comment says full-access approval took about two days.
Open classification and ticket draft
Creators are reasoning about base pay plus CPM in public comments.
Reddit discussion mentions talking-head base pay plus CPM.
Open classification and ticket draft
Minimum view thresholds are confusing creators around guaranteed base pay.
A Reddit reply asks whether a two-thousand-view minimum applies to base pay.
Open classification and ticket draft
Bounty social promotion mechanics can leak into trust complaints if winners, odds, or rules are unclear.
An April 16 Bounty one-star review frames a social media raffle as fake.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal suggests billing, refund, or cancellation confusion that can leak trust.
Cluely App Store review: Worst software - I just downloaded the app to try and I canceled the subscription how ever I was charged for yearly subscription and I asked for refund..they say as per our policy we don’t refund blah blah blah
Open classification and ticket draft
Cancellation and annual charge complaints repeat beyond a single review.
An April 10 review says a canceled trial still turned into a yearly charge and refund request.
Open classification and ticket draft
Bounty support has positive proof points that should be preserved beside account-status complaints.
An April 10 Bounty review praises support response speed after a user had issues.
Open classification and ticket draft
Some positive Bounty reviews are low-quality and should not be read as clean demand signal.
An April 10 Bounty five-star review includes unsafe joke copy rather than clean product praise.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Bounty App Store review: Excellent support - Had a few problems with some things and reached out to support. They quite literally responded back in 2 minutes lol. Helped me out within 5. Great service!!
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal suggests creator verification or onboarding is blocking activation.
Bounty App Store review: Can’t upload video to get full access - I tried getting verified with multiple different videos but it just doesn’t work. My video for verification met all the criteria but it says failed when uploading it. This thing overall just seems like a scam anyway.
Open classification and ticket draft
Bounty onboarding is actively changing and should be watched for approval confusion.
Version 2.0.3 says Bounty shipped onboarding changes.
Open classification and ticket draft
Age eligibility confusion is visible in public reviews.
Public App Store review asks whether the app is 13+ or 18+ because terms and store age language differ.
Open classification and ticket draft
Bounty UX is still moving quickly and may affect creator support load.
Version 2.0.2 says Bounty improved app UX.
Open classification and ticket draft
Direct company submissions likely changed the review and rejection workflow.
Version 2.0.1 removed bounties and moved users to submissions straight to companies.
Open classification and ticket draft
Inspiration feed helps creators but may create copycat or ad-quality questions.
Version 2.0.1 added a curated feed of inspirations on the home page.
Open classification and ticket draft
Market comparison frames Cluely against post-call notetakers like Granola.
A third-party review compares Cluely to a notetaker that records calls and summarizes afterward.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal suggests setup or permission friction in a core capture workflow.
Cluely App Store review: Deceptive Trial & Poor Support - Don’t be fooled by the "free trial." Even with screenshots proving I canceled, they charged me anyway and refused a refund. Their "cancel anytime" policy is a trap. Extremely disappointed with this dishonest. Save your money and find a better app!
Open classification and ticket draft
Trial cancellation language is turning into public scam-adjacent copy.
A March 26 review describes a free-trial cancellation dispute and refusal of refund.
Open classification and ticket draft
Recent mobile releases are still changing core app design.
Version 1.2.2 says the mobile app shipped improved app designs.
Open classification and ticket draft
Onboarding is active enough to need redesigns and follow-up monitoring.
Version 1.2.1 says the onboarding experience was redesigned.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal suggests billing, refund, or cancellation confusion that can leak trust.
Cluely App Store review: Buyer Beware - I was disappointed with this app when I request requested a refund and they neglected to do it based on their Refund policy, absolutely eval the app in the trial period. This is the first app I’ve come across that does issue refunds at $140 it was a costly mistake.
Open classification and ticket draft
Refund policy clarity is a recurring trust issue across March through May App Store reviews.
A March 17 review says a refund request was denied and frames the trial as costly.
Open classification and ticket draft
Transcription quality was important enough to change providers publicly.
Version 1.2.0 mentions moving to AssemblyAI for better transcriptions.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Cluely App Store review: Bugs - Lots of bugs
Open classification and ticket draft
Refund questions are visible outside support channels.
A Reddit thread asks how to contact Cluely for a refund.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public support guidance is being supplied peer-to-peer.
A reply says emailing support may be the only way to get Cluely's attention.
Open classification and ticket draft
Permissions are complex enough to be called out in public troubleshooting.
A public review says Cluely help docs reference microphone and screen/system audio permissions.
Open classification and ticket draft
Bounty is being discussed as connected to Cluely, making brand trust shared.
A Reddit thread asks whether creators have tried the Cluely platform Bounty.
Open classification and ticket draft
Creator performance depends on native-feeling content, not just following scripts.
A Reddit comment says creators can get paid for views and that content must feel native.
Open classification and ticket draft
Creators are optimizing around unclear quality and cadence rules.
A Reddit comment warns that repeated promos can hurt performance or pause a creator.
Open classification and ticket draft
Performance and bug fixes are recurring release-note themes.
Version 1.1.9 says the release improved speed and fixed bugs.
Open classification and ticket draft
Pricing and paywall behavior changed recently and can amplify refund complaints.
Version 1.1.8 says the pricing paywall was modified to be dynamic.
Open classification and ticket draft
Third-party cheat framing can create reputational and compliance risk.
A third-party page calls Cluely an AI assistant for cheating on everything.
Open classification and ticket draft
Large payout claims can help trust but need careful substantiation.
A public post says Bounty paid more than 500k dollars to UGC creators in six months.
Open classification and ticket draft
Multiple Bounty entry points can fragment onboarding and support.
A public post points creators to create.bounty.app for UGC opportunities.
Open classification and ticket draft
Subscription handling changed publicly, creating support and cancellation edge cases.
Version 1.1.6 says the app moved to App Store-based subscriptions.
Open classification and ticket draft
Real-time recording and summary quality are core product claims under active iteration.
Version 1.1.5 says real-time recording and summary quality were improved.
Open classification and ticket draft
Desktop-to-mobile note review is a positive product thread.
Version 1.1.5 says users can view desktop notes on the go.
Open classification and ticket draft
In-person meeting capture is a major mobile surface and needs reliability tracking.
Version 1.1.4 introduced the mobile notetaker for in-person meetings.
Open classification and ticket draft
The undetectable framing is repeating in third-party discussion.
A public Reddit review frames Cluely as an undetectable AI meeting assistant.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Look who’s finally on the App Store - This was the single most important feature for me, having it on mobile! And the UI is great here too   submitted by   /u/CampingRunner   to   r/Cluely [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal suggests setup or permission friction in a core capture workflow.
Cluely App Store review: Nice App - It doesn’t work like the screen share desktop app. And doesn’t detect the voice on the call on my iPhone.
Open classification and ticket draft
Users value meeting organization and action-item capture.
Public review says Cluely reduces the pain of managing and organizing meetings.
Open classification and ticket draft
Real-time transcription is the mobile app's core promise.
Version 1.1.2 says hello to real-time meeting transcription.
Open classification and ticket draft
Mobile desktop-note review is a concrete positive workflow.
Public review says the mobile app is useful for catching up on desktop meeting notes away from a laptop.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
It says 8 usd/month for pro version for the yearly plan but when I click on Subscribe it shows 12 usd/month - It says 8 usd/month for pro version for the yearly plan but when I click on Subscribe it shows 12 usd/month   submitted by   /u/Willing-Increase6103   to   r/Cluely [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
It says 8 usd/ month for pro version -   submitted by   /u/Willing-Increase6103   to   r/Cluely [link]   [comments]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
6 prompts I actually use with Cluely and ChatGPT - I use Cluely as my notetaker and ChatGPT for follow ups. These six prompts keep me moving when I am short on time. Paste notes or task lists where it makes sense. 1) The Prioritizer Prompt: “Act as my time management coach. Here are my tasks: [PASTE TASKS]. Sort them into an Eisenhower Matrix: Urgent and Important, Not Urgent but Important, Urgent but Not Important, Not Urgent and Not Important. Give me a one day plan with at most six items and time estimates. Flag quick wins. Tell me what to delegate or delete.” 2) The Creative Fix Prompt: “You are a business strategist. Give me five unconventional and testable ways to solve [PROBLEM] for a [TYPE OF BUSINESS]. For each idea include a one sentence pitch, the first experiment to run this week, effort S or M or L, and one success metric.” 3) The Project Decomposer Prompt: “Turn this project into three clear milestones: [DESCRIBE PROJECT]. For each milestone list the objective, what is in and out of scope, a checklist of three to five steps, and a simple definition of done. Finish with the top risks I might be missing.” 4) The Decision Snapshot Prompt: “I am choosing between [SOLUTION A] and [SOLUTION B]. Make a cost benefit table with initial cost, long term ROI, implementation time, ease of use, risk, and hidden costs. Then give a tie break recommendation for my context [BUSINESS SIZE or TEAM or TOOLSTACK], a two week trial plan, and clear kill criteria.” 5) The Insight Extractor Prompt: “I pasted a transcript or report below from Cluely. Pull the top three actionable insights or trends. For each, suggest one move a small business can do in one week or less with expected impact and a simple KPI. End with a short summary I can paste in Slack. [PASTE TRANSCRIPT OR REPORT]” 6) The Weekly Focus Builder Prompt: “My main goal this quarter is [GOAL]. Create a Monday to Friday plan for my work hours [HOURS] that protects deep work. Include daily focus blocks, one admin block
Open classification and ticket draft
Screen and microphone access requirements are central to public trust concerns.
A public review says Cluely needs permission to read the screen and listen to the microphone.
Open classification and ticket draft
Answer quality and latency complaints show up in public review snippets.
A public review mentions generic suggestions, latency, and load-related issues.
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal touches claim language or trust positioning that needs careful review.
[MEGATHREAD] Detectability & "Does it work on X?" (All Qs go here) - Central hub for all questions about Cluely's undetectability mode and features, as well as platform compatibility. All "Does it work on X?" posts and comments go here. 🧠 Quick FAQ & Feature Summary What is Cluely? Cluely is the ultimate real-time meeting assistant. It uses your screen and audio during meetings, to instantly give you definitions, context, and helpful info. Cluely also creates beautiful, shareable notes for you after every meeting. Undetectability Features Invisible to Screen-Share: Cluely is completely undetectable by screen-share feeds (Zoom, Meet, Teams, etc.) This will work for every operating system besides Windows 10 and *some* versions of MacOS. When trying out Cluely, turn on undetectable mode and test it out on a Google Meet to determine if it will work on your system. Non-Focus Stealing Behavior: Unlike almost every other tool, including ChatGPT, Cluely when used will not steal keyboard or window focus. So when you use any of the commands to trigger any of Cluely's actions, there will be no stolen focus, and your cursor will stay focused on the active tab. This makes for a seamless experience. Movable/Adaptive Overlay: Use CMD/CTRL + the arrow keys to move the window around anywhere. This is helpful for making sure your gaze stays focused on the person you're talking to and centered on the screen. Global hotkeys: Core Cluely interactions use system-wide shortcuts (e.g., `Cmd+Enter`). These operations are not detectable by anything on the browser and are different from every browser-extension that claims to do something similar. Similar to opening your Spotlight Search on Mac, these shortcuts won't be able to go detected by any software. General Rule of Thumb As long as you test that the screen-share invisibility is working on your local machine Cluely will be 100% undetectable by any platform that is browser-based. If you are trying to use Clu
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
CluelyApp - https://cluely.com/ [link]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
Cluely - Cluely is the #1 live meeting AI notetaker to get real-time help with AI and beautiful, shareable notes after. [link]
Open classification and ticket draft
Public signal needs manual review before any internal claim is made.
TeenageBountyHunter - From the creator of Orange Is The New Black and Glow the new series stars Maddie Phillips and Anjelica Bette Fellini as twins, Sterling and Blair Wesley. In case you hadn’t clocked from the show’s name, Sterling and Blair are 16 year old bounty hunters, recruited by Bowser (Kadeem Hardison), who is super-experienced when it comes to catching those who have skipped bail. [link]
Open classification and ticket draft